FIU-NL gets a pause button, but crypto keeps moving

From 1 July 2026, Financial Intelligence Unit Nederland (FIU-NL) will receive a new power: the power to postpone transactions. Under the new Article 17a Wwft, FIU-NL may require reporting institutions to temporarily postpone one or more transactions if there are signs of money laundering, related criminal activity or terrorist financing. 

The word temporarily is important. 

This is not a general freezing power. A postponement may last for up to five working days. If the request is made on behalf of a foreign FIU, it may last for up to ten working days. The aim is to create a short period in which suspicious value can be stopped before it disappears. 

The Anti Money Laundering Centre, the knowledge and expertise centre of the FIOD, has described the new power in similar terms. It is a temporary tool with clear limits. It is not an open-ended freeze. 

Why crypto makes this more complex

For crypto, this distinction matters. 

FIU-NL’s new power does not extend to stopping a blockchain network in its entirety. Unlike a bank transfer that may sometimes be recalled, or a payment instruction that may still be intercepted, on-chain transactions are settled by the network itself. Once crypto assets have been broadcast to and confirmed on a blockchain network, the transaction is generally final in practice. It cannot usually be reversed by a regulated platform or by a government authority. 

There is one practical point to keep in mind. A crypto withdrawal request is not always the same as a completed blockchain transaction. Before confirmation, a transaction may still be pending. It may still be inside the platform’s own systems, or it may be waiting for confirmation by the network. At that stage, it may still be possible to stop it. 

Once the transaction has been confirmed on chain, the original transfer is effectively out of reach. 

Where the pause button can still work

This makes exchanges, brokers and custody providers important control points. They may still be able to stop a pending withdrawal, restrict crypto assets held in custody, or block a customer’s balance before value leaves the platform. 

FIU-NL’s new power can therefore help in two practical situations: where crypto assets are still held in a custodial account at a regulated platform, and where fiat proceeds or other customer balances remain available. 

However, the new power does not solve the crypto’s speed and finality problem. If the relevant transaction has already been confirmed on chain, the pause button comes too late for that transaction. 

Why this matters for regulated platforms and their customers

For regulated platforms, such as exchanges and custody providers, FIU-NL’s new power has direct operational consequences. When a platform receives a postponement request from FIU-NL, it must act immediately. It must also be able to document its response afterwards. 

This means the issue is not only legal. Platforms need clear internal procedures. These procedures should explain how FIU-NL requests are received, escalated, and handled. They should also make clear who is authorized to act on such requests, how the relevant assets or balances are identified, and how each step is recorded. 

The effectiveness of the new power will also depend heavily on the quality and speed of the platform’s transaction monitoring. Suspicious activity that is only identified after a withdrawal has been confirmed on chain cannot be postponed or reversed. Platforms should therefore assess whether their monitoring, alert handling and withdrawal controls are fast enough. 

This also matters for customers. A delayed withdrawal or temporarily restricted balance should be handled quickly, consistently and in line with the legal requirements. If the platform is allowed or required to communicate with the customer, it should be able to explain the situation clearly without harming the legal process. 

There is also a risk that bad actors will adapt. They may try to move assets away from regulated platforms more quickly, because those platforms are the main point where transactions can still be stopped. This makes fast monitoring, clear escalation and effective withdrawal controls even more important. 

Part of a broader AML trend

The Dutch change should not be seen on its own. Similar intervention tools already exist in other European AML frameworks. FIU-NL has also noted that many foreign FIUs already have comparable powers, and that the Dutch addition should support international cooperation. 

The direction is clear. AML is moving beyond reporting suspicion after the event. Increasingly, the focus is on stopping suspicious value flows before they disappear. 

Crypto tests the limits of this approach. 

The legal power to pause a transaction only matters where there is still practical control. Platforms can freeze, delay, or block. Blockchains do not rewind. 

Conclusion

FIU-NL’s new power is useful, but it is not a full solution for crypto. It can help stop suspicious asset while that asset is still inside a regulated platform. The same applies where related fiat proceeds or other customer balances remain available.

A confirmed blockchain transaction, however, generally cannot be reversed.

For regulated platforms, the main compliance challenge is speed. They need fast monitoring, clear escalation routes, practical procedures and strong withdrawal controls 

Invitation to Consult

If this article has raised questions or topics you would like to discuss further, we welcome you to reach out. If you have a specific case you would like to explore, we are happy to arrange an informal introductory conversation. Our contact details can be found here.

Read more updates and articles here.